Revision Guidelines

Introduction

Revisions are a crucial part of the publication process, providing authors with the opportunity to improve their manuscript based on feedback from reviewers. Lex Gazette has established clear guidelines for handling revisions to ensure a smooth and efficient process. This section outlines the procedures and expectations for authors when revising and resubmitting their manuscripts.

Types of Revisions

  1. Minor Revisions:
    • Scope: Involves making small adjustments or corrections to the manuscript. These may include minor edits to text, formatting, or clarifications based on reviewer comments.
    • Timeline: Typically requires 1-2 weeks for completion.
  2. Major Revisions:
    • Scope: Requires significant changes to the manuscript, such as additional experiments, extensive data analysis, or substantial rewriting.
    • Timeline: Typically requires 2-4 weeks for completion, depending on the extent of the revisions.

Revision Process

  1. Receiving Revision Decision:
    • Notification: Authors will receive a decision mail from the editorial team outlining the reviewers’ comments and required revisions.
    • Instructions: The decision mail will include detailed instructions on how to address each comment and the deadline for resubmission.
  2. Preparing the Revised Manuscript:
    • Addressing Comments: Authors should carefully address each comment and suggestion provided by the reviewers. It is important to respond to all points raised, even if some comments are not incorporated into the revised manuscript.
  3. Resubmitting the Manuscript:
    • Revised Manuscript: Submit the revised manuscript through the online submission system. Ensure that all changes are clearly marked (e.g., using tracked changes in Word) to facilitate the review process.
    • Response Letter: Submit the response letter along with the revised manuscript. The letter should be structured to correspond with the reviewers’ comments, providing a clear explanation of the changes made.
  4. Review of Revised Manuscript:
    • Re-evaluation: The revised manuscript may be sent back to the original reviewers for further evaluation or to new reviewers if necessary.
    • Additional Feedback: The editorial team will review the revised manuscript and provide additional feedback if needed.
  5. Final Decision:
    • Decision: After the re-evaluation, the editorial team will make a final decision on the manuscript. This may result in acceptance, additional revisions, or rejection.
    • Notification: Authors will be notified of the final decision and any further steps required.

Guidelines for Authors

  1. Be Thorough:
    • Address all comments and suggestions from the reviewers. Provide detailed explanations for any changes made or reasons for not incorporating certain suggestions.
  2. Be Clear and Concise:
    • Ensure that revisions are clearly marked and easy to identify. Use track changes or a highlighted version of the manuscript to show modifications.
  3. Be Timely:
    • Adhere to the revision timeline provided. If additional time is needed, contact the editorial team to request an extension.
  4. Maintain Professionalism:
    • Respond to reviewer comments respectfully and professionally. Avoid confrontational language and focus on constructive dialogue.
  5. Check Formatting:
    • Ensure that the revised manuscript adheres to the journal’s formatting guidelines and submission requirements.

Conclusion

The revision process is an opportunity to enhance the quality of your manuscript and address feedback from the review process. By following these guidelines, authors can ensure a smooth and effective revision process, ultimately contributing to the successful publication of their work in Lex Gazette.